Center for Liberal Strategies (CLS): ‘The Future through the
Culture of the Past: Bulgarian Economic and Social History’
Seminar presents:
Images of Bulgaria in British Commercial Discourses Before
1914
lecture by Mika Suonpaa (University of Hull, UK)
The overall aim of the paper is to examine British commerce-related
representations of Bulgaria between the mid-nineteenth century
and 1914. Conceptually, the paper investigates the extent
and the ways in which commercial decision-making was affected
by cultural attitudes and perceptions, and whether cross-cultural
commercial contacts produced generalising or stereotypical
views. A distinction is made between the attitudes of British
businessmen and diplomats which often differed quite significantly.
The intention is not to explain economic phenomena purely
from a cultural perspective, but rather to bring cross-cultural
commercial relations more closely into the realm of the field
of Balkan studies that examines British images of the region.
The first part of the paper examines portrayals of Bulgaria
as a country in which considerable investment and trading
opportunities existed, and how these perceptions led to the
founding of numerous ‘Anglo-Bulgarian’ companies – examples
of which will be taken from banking, construction and manufacturing
industries. This section will also explore reasons for British
companies’ business failures in Bulgaria in a wider Balkan
context, and it ends with a discussion of factors that contributed
to successes of British enterprise in Bulgaria, which included
local knowledge and the ability to attract Bulgarian investors.
The second part will deal with concerns that were expressed
by established British exporters, investors and other firms
who had or attempted to extend their operations into Bulgaria.
Problems occurred especially when British companies were involved
in competitions for public contracts and concessions and whenever
legislations that were designed to protect Bulgarian industries
were introduced from the 1890s onwards. These difficulties
did not however lead to generalisations or expressions of
stereotypical derogatory ‘balkanist’ views because British
businessmen were mostly concerned with concrete financial
and economic aspects. British businesses reacted to commercial
difficulties by appealing to diplomats for support, but often
without success. Diplomatic assistance was often refused on
statutory grounds or as a result of negative attitudes to
prospects for success even if diplomatic support was given.
Furthermore, it seemed that British diplomats hesitated to
give assistance if promoters had foreign connections or if
they were Jewish. To an extent, diplomatic hesitation in the
case of Bulgaria and the Slavic Balkans more generally went
against the broad outlines of commercial policy which from
the 1880s onwards was more inclined towards supporting British
commercial interests abroad than denying it because of the
growing competition from continental European and American
enterprises, especially in the manufacturing sector.
The third part continues to concentrate further on the diplomatic
responses to commercial difficulties. Diplomats’ views were
often much more critical than those of British businessmen,
and they, unlike the businessmen, often argued, for example,
that xenophobic sentiments in Bulgaria drove away foreign
businesses, and thus, British investors and exporters should
not commit to commercial arrangements in the country. Diplomats
were also much more likely to fall into generalising ‘balkanist’
categorising than the businessmen, and often argued, for example,
that Bulgarians and other Balkan Slavs were unreliable business
partners because they came from peasant backgrounds. These
sentiments illustrated that British diplomats were very much
influenced by their aristocratic prejudices against the peasantry
and that their views were also seemingly affected by the lack
of hands-on commercial experience. Thus, in addition to financial
and economic factors, negative perceptions or indeed positive
ones, certainly had an effect on the types of advice that
British diplomats gave which meant that prejudices and (pre)conceptions
were likely also to have an effect on commercial policy-making.
In contrast, there was no evidence that commercial difficulties
or negative preconceptions had any power in changing or having
any significant effects on the decision-making processes of
British businessmen. However, at times, cultural conceptions
also informed the thinking of businessmen, for example, about
the types of products that were likely to succeed in Bulgaria.
Contacts: Mika Suonpaa (University of Hull,
UK ) - m.suonpaa@hull.ac.uk
The seminar is led by Roumen Avramov (Center for Liberal Strategies)
and Martin Ivanov (Institute of History, Bulgarian Academy
of Sciences).
March 19 (Wednesday) 2008, 5.30
p.m.
Pesha Nikolova hall
In English, no interpretation provided.
Free entrance
back to Lectures
|